|
Workshop
# 1: Theory and Use of Field Portable X-ray Fluorescence
for Soil Analysis
Debbie Schatzlein, Sr. Applications Chemist, NITON
Corporation, Billerica, MA
Volker Thomsen, Sr. Application Scientist, NITON
Corporation, Billerica, MA
This
workshop will cover the application of field-portable
x-ray fluorescence spectrometry to soil analysis. We
begin with basic theory of x-ray fluorescence and an
overview of the applications for this instrumental method
of chemical analysis. This will be followed by a
discussion of the nstrumentation along with elements of
radiation safety. Statistical aspects of the
measurements will be discussed. Finally, an overview
and discussion of EPA SW-846 Method 6200 will be
presented. Hands on use of the instruments will be
promoted through several practical exercises.
Workshop
# 2: In-Situ
Chemical Oxidation Workshop
William
B. Kerfoot, Ph.D., LSP,
K-V Associates, Inc.,
Michael Marley, John Cookson, Jr., Kenneth Sperry,
Xpert Design and Diagnostics, LLC
To
provide up-to-date information on in-situ chemical
oxidation, this all-day workshop combines vendor
presentations with professional consultant experience.
Four major oxidants will be considered:
Permanganate - MNO4 -
Persulfate – S2O82-
Hydrogen peroxide – Fenton’s Reagent – H2O2
Ozone – O3
In-situ chemical oxidation using ozone, Fenton’s
Reagent, persulfate, permanganate or combinations can be
an effective innovative technology for destroying organic
contaminants within the groundwater aquifer where they
occur. Each
oxidant requires certain design considerations for proper
application. This
workshop concentrates on the following topics.
·
Oxidant chemistry principles
·
Available oxidants/compound stoichiometry
·
Oxidant selection/site evaluation
·
Laboratory bench-scale tests
·
Field pilot tests
·
Regulatory concerns
·
Case histories and time to closure
Presentations
will be made by vendors who supply equipment and
consulting firms with specific site experience.
Case studies will be presented where design and
operational issues will be discussed.
Workshop
#3: TBA/MTBE Remediation Seminar Abstract
Ron
Jansen, President, Remedial Operations Group, Crosby, TX
Ellen Moyer, Ph.D., P.E., Senior Project Manager, Tighe
& Bond, Inc., Westfield, MA
Richard Woodward, President, Sierra Environmental
Services, Houston, TX
Richard Sloan, Chickadee Remediation Company, Houston, TX
This
seminar reviews physical, chemical, and biodegradation
characteristics of tert butyl alcohol (TBA) and methyl
tert butyl ether (MTBE).
Consideration of these characteristics leading to
the optimization of remedial technologies employed at
affected groundwater sites is evaluated and illustrated
through a number of case studies.
Optimal remedial strategies take advantage of the
characteristics of TBA, MTBE and other gasoline
components, and often consist of a sequence of actions
starting with receptor protection and source control,
followed by remediation of residual and dissolved
contamination, and ending with natural attenuation.
The
seminar will explore the selection and execution of
current and emerging technologies for the remediation of
TBA, MTBE, and other gasoline components.
Commonly used technologies include:
soil vapor extraction; bioventing; air sparging; in
situ ground water bioremediation; ex situ groundwater
bioremediation; pump and treat; in situ chemical
oxidation; and monitored natural attenuation.
Every
site is different, with its own set of characteristics and
challenges. Regardless of the composition of gasoline,
rapid source control is critical to minimize environmental
impact Optimal
strategies take advantage of these site characteristics as
well as the specific characteristics of TBA and MTBE for
cost-effective, timely, and environmentally sound TBA and
MTBE remediation.
Workshop
#4: A Practical Approach for Assessing Upward Vapor
Intrusion Risk
Blayne
Hartman, Ph.D., TEG, Solano Beach, CA
This
workshop provides a comprehensive training class for
regulators, responsible parties, and/or consultants on how
to understand and assess the vapor intrusion pathway.
The workshop includes a review of the principles
behind this risk pathway, a concise and understandable
summary of the Environmental Protection Agency draft
guidance, a demonstration of field methods used to access
the risk, and a recommended sampling protocol for
determining the risk.
The workshop is structured to provide a summary of
mathematical models used to assess upward vapor intrusion
tisks, a presentation of the alpha values used for
assessing risk, and an overview of the soil vapor sampling
protocols, such as soil gas active methods, vapor
monitoring implants and flux chambers, used to obtain
representative data for use in the upward vapor intrusion
risk models.
Barbara O’Grady,
Marion Galant, Colorado Dept of Public Health and
Environment, Wendy O’Brien, USEPA, Region VIII, Celia
VanDerLoop, City and County of Denver, Michael Grodin,
Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health
Soil
sampling in low-income Denver neighborhoods and a citywide
selection of pre-1960s homes has shown high levels of
arsenic in residential soils in a random pattern.
The source seems to be arsenical pesticides –
this is “product” not “waste.” Could one find similar results in virtually any pre-1960s
community? What
can be done to reduce the hazard?
What resources might be available to address the
problem? Is
it responsible to test, tell homeowners they have a
problem, and not be able to offer cleanup assistance?
A panel of presenters, including a medical
ethicist, a project manager, a geologist and a community
involvement specialist will present the issue then open
the floor to discussion.
Worskhop
#6: Implementing the Massachusetts DEP's New Data
Enhancement Policy - PRACTICAL Data Quality Tips for LSPs
and other Data Users
Carol
Bois, L.S.P., Bois Consulting Company, Inc., Framingham,
MA, John Fitzgerald, Mass. DEP, One Winter Street, Boston,
MA, James Occhialini, Alpha Analytical Laboratories,
Westboro, MA
This
workshop will expand on the DEP's latest policy,
effective August 2003, regarding the LSP's use of
laboratory analytical data for sites in Massachusetts. The
DEP's recommended "presumptive certainty"
defense will be reviewed so that LSPs can understand their
options under the new policy. Case studies will be
reviewed so that workshop participants understand the practical
application of the policy. Information will be
provided from a regulatory, practitioner's, and chemist's
perspective - without the chemistry jargon.
Top
|